Motor Coaches Contessa Compare

Compare Prices and Read Reviews on "beaver motor coach rvs" RVs at Epinions.com Join Epinions | Help | Sign In RVs Cars & Motorsports All Categories Advanced Search Home > Cars & Motorsports > RVs We found 5 results for RVs "beaver motor coach rvs" Search again by Keyword Return to RVs Search Results Showing 1-5 of 5 items Hide photos Sort by Rating Sort by Average Price Compare 2000 Beaver Motor Coaches Contessa Compare 2000 Beaver Motor Coaches Marquis Compare 2000 Beaver Motor Coaches Monterey Compare 2000 Beaver Motor Coaches Patriot Compare 2000 Beaver Motor Coaches Solitaire Showing 1-5 of 5 items Refine these results by Length (feet) Over 30 feet Long (3) 20 feet to 30 feet Long (1) or Refine By Keyword Featured Resources Rv's that Drive like SUVs Roadtrek: comforts of larger RVs with ease of driving an SUV. www.roadtrek.com USA RV Rentals Book early and save! Convenient locations and great rates. www.usarvrentals.com Beaver RV Listings New & Used Beaver RVs includes Photos, Floorplans, Specs. & Prices RVweb.com New and Used Motorhomes Browse our huge selection See Pictures and Floorplans www.motorhomespecialist.com Search for RVs Use our search tool to find the RV you are looking for. www.RV-Finder.com Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising Epinions | DealTime USA | DealTime UK | PriceTool | Shopping.com | Rent.com © 1999-2006 Epinions, Inc. Trademark Notice Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.

motor homes onpurchased chassis

2002 NAICS Definitions: 336213 Motor Home Manufacturing 2002 NAICS Definitions 336213 Motor Home Manufacturing This U.S. industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in (1) manufacturing motor homes onpurchased chassis and/or (2) manufacturing conversion vans on an assembly line basis. Motor homesare units where the motor and the living quarters are integrated in the same unit. Cross-References. Establishments primarily engaged in-- Manufacturing light duty motor homes chassis and assembling complete motorhomes--are classified in U.S. Industry 336112 , Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing; Customizing automotive vehicle and trailer interiors (i.e. , van conversions) on anindividual basis--are classified in U.S. Industry 811121 , Automotive Body, Paint, and InteriorRepair and Maintenance; and Producing manufactured homes (i.e., mobile homes)--are classified in U.S. Industry 321991 , Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing. Go to: No change 1997 to 2002 2002 NAICS to 1987 SIC 1997 Economic Census Bridge Between 1997 NAICS and SIC 2002 NAICS 1997 NAICS 1987 SIC Corresponding Index Entries 336213 336213 3716 Assembly line conversions of purchased vans and mini-vans 336213 336213 3716 Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis 336213 336213 3716 Van and minivan conversions on purchased chassis Census Bureau Links: Home · Search · Subjects A-Z · FAQs · Data Tools · Catalog · Census 2000 · Quality · Privacy Policy · Contact Us

RV Trader RV Insider

Resources for Buying and Selling RVs, Campers and Trailers - RVTraderOnline.com Contents Home Search Browse Place An Ad · modify your ad · renew your ad Find a Dealer Buyer's Guide Subscribe Help My RV Trader RV Insider Resources Financial Services NADA RV Values Insurance Products for the RV Lifestyle RV Transport Warranties RV Donation Generators RV Lots and Properties for Sale Campgrounds/Resorts RV Rentals Loan Calculator RV Links Escrow Dealers Sign Up Now! Demo Login Password Forgot your password? Click here . Resources for Buying & Selling RVs, Campers & Trailers Warranties Buying a pre-owned RV from a distant seller does not have to be a headache. These companies can provide you with a quote on warranty protection for the RV you buy. Want to see your business listed on this page? Call 1-877-354-4068, or click here to email our sales staff. Pick Up a National RV Trader Today! | Search | Place an Ad | Find a Dealer | Resources | Site Map | | Contact Us | About Us | Help | Privacy Policy | Fraud Prevention Tips | Visitor Agreement | Security Center | 2006, Trader Publishing Company All Rights Reserved. This document is strictly for informational, non-commercial purposes. Aero | ATV | Auto | Auto | -- Boats | Collector Car | Cycle | Equipment | Merchandise | RV | Truck | TraderOnline || Apartments | Homes | Jobs | Lodging | Parenthood | Vacation Rentals AutoExtra.com | AutoMart.com BoatTraderOnline.com | Boats.com | YachtWorld.com | Soundings | Nor'easter | PassageMaker HarmonHomes.com | Homes.com | NUMBER1EXPERT.com | DistinctHomes.com

Fleetwood RV Download Library

Fleetwood RV Brochure Download Library Welcome! [sign in to access My Fleetwood] My Fleetwood Luxury Coaches American Heritage American Eagle American Tradition Diesel Coaches Revolution Revolution LE Excursion Providence Discovery Bounder Diesel Expedition Gas Motor Homes Pace Arrow Southwind Bounder Flair Storm Terra Fiesta Mini Motor Homes Tioga Tioga SL Tioga SLX Jamboree Jamboree GT Jamboree GTX Travel Trailers Triumph Pride Terry Prowler Wilderness Mallard Pioneer Pegasus Orbit Toy Haulers GearBox Nitrous Hyperlite RedLine Folding Camping Trailers Destiny Americana Highlander Scorpion Evolution Element Download Library Welcome to the Fleetwood RV Download Library Download information about our recreational vehicles. Fleetwood RV provides two types of product literature: brochure and flyers, both in PDF form. Prefer printed brochures? Request Fleetwood RV literature via mail. Choose a Fleetwood Brand - Choose One - - Luxury Coaches - American Eagle American Heritage American Tradition - Diesel Motor Homes - Bounder Diesel Discovery Excursion Expedition Providence Revolution LE - Gas Motor Homes - Bounder Fiesta Flair Pace Arrow Southwind Storm Terra - Mini Motor Homes - Jamboree Jamboree GT Jamboree GTX Tioga Tioga SL Tioga SLX - Travel Trailers - Mallard Orbit Pegasus Pioneer Prowler Prowler Lynx Terry Terry Dakota Wilderness Wilderness Yukon Pride Prowler Regal AX6 Terry Quantum AX6 Triumph Wilderness Advantage AX6 - Toy Haulers - GearBox Nitrous Hyperlite - Folding Camping Trailers - Americana Destiny Element Evolution Highlander Scorpion FLEETWOOD RV BROCHURES: full color interior and exterior product photography, highlights of key features. FLEETWOOD RV FLYERS: all available floorplans and complete technical specifications. 2006 Bounder brochure (1.5 MB) 2006 Bounder flyer (868 KB) 2005 Bounder brochure (1.4 MB) 2005 Bounder flyer (941 KB) 2004 Bounder brochure (3 MB) 2004 Bounder flyer (482 KB) 2003 Bounder brochure (4.3 MB) 2003 Bounder flyer (257 KB) 2002 Bounder brochure (1.8 MB) 2002 Bounder flyer (910 KB) 2001 Bounder brochure (2.4 MB) 2000 Bounder brochure (710 KB) 1999 Bounder brochure (330 KB) Fleetwood RV brochures and flyers require Adobe Acrobat Reader . Home | Contact Us | Owners Clubs | Plant Tours | Your Privacy | About this Site Fleetwood RV Store | Fleetwood.com | Employment | Website Feedback

MOBILE HOME SALES LTD.

RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. AND LE GREELY (618) RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. 283 RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. AND LE GREELY (1978), 85 D.L.R. (3d) 618 British Columbia Court of Appeal, Farris C.J.B.C., Taggart and SeatonJJ.A., 6 March 1978 (On appeal from judgment of British Columbia County Court, suprap.278) 284 RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. (618) Landlord and tenant -- Rent -- Increase -- Whether provisions of Landlordand Tenant Act restricting rent increases applicable to premises located on In- dian reserve where landlord and tenant not Indians -- Landlord and Tenant Act,1974 (B.C.), c. 45, s. 27. Indians -- Jurisdiction -- Landlord and Tenant Act restricting right to in- crease rent -- Whether applicable to tenancy of residential premises on Indianreserve where landlord and tenant not Indians -- Landlord and Tenant Act, 1974(B.C.), c. 45, s. 27. Section 27 (rep. & sub. 1974, c. 109, s. 10) of the Landlord and Tenant Act , 1974(B.C.), c. 45, which restricts the right of a landlord to increase rent for residentialpremises, applies to a month-to-month tenancy of a pad located in a mobile homepark on an Indian reserve where the landlord and tenant are not Indians. The Landlord and Tenant Act is within the legislative authority of the Province pur- suant to s. 92 of the British North American Act, 1867 , and is not legislation in rela- tion to a subject-matter assigned exclusively to the Canadian Parliament under91 of that Act. [ Cardinal v. A.-G. Alta. (1973), 40 D.L.R. (3d) 553, 13 C.C.C. (2d) 1, [1974] 2 S.C.R.695, [1973] 6 W.W.R. 205, apld; Corp. of Surrey et al. v. Peace Arch Enterprises Ltd.et al. (1970), 74 W.W.R. 380, distd] APPEAL from a judgment affirming the jurisdiction of the rent- alsman. John A. McAfee , for applicant, appellant. J. T. Steeves and N. W. Dowad , for respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered by FARRIS, C.J.B.C.:--The issue in this appeal is whether s. 27 [rep.& sub. 1974, c. 109, s. 10] of the Landlord and Tenant Act , 1974(B.C.) c. 45, which restricts the right of a landlord to increase rentfor residential premises applies to a month-to-month tenancy of apad located in a mobile home park on an Indian reserve, the land- lord and tenant being non-Indians. It is my view that this sectiondoes apply. The Tsinstikeptum Indian Reserve No. 9 is located in OsoyoosDivision of the Yale District of the Province of British Columbia.On July 1,1971, Her Majesty the Queen, represented by the Minis- ter of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, leased to Wes- Kel Holdings Ltd., Lots 31 and 32 of the reserve, for a term of 50years. On October 12,1972, Wes-Kel Holdings Ltd. sublet the prop- erty (for the balance of the term) to Park Mobile Homes Sales Ltd.,the appellant herein. In August, 1975, the appellant rented a mo- bile home pad to the respondent Le Greely pursuant to the termsof a month-to-month residential tenancy agreement. Subsequently,a dispute arose between the appellant and the respondent in re- spect of a proposed rent increase. (619) RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. 285 A hearing was held on the matter before the rentalsman underthe provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act . At the hearing,counsel for the appellant argued that the rentalsman was withoutjurisdiction to hear the dispute as the mobile park was located onIndian land belonging to the federal Government. The rentalsmanruled that he did have jurisdiction to hear this dispute. An appealwas taken from his decision to His Honour Judge Macdonald, who,in effect, affirmed the rentalsman's decision. It is from thisaffirmation that the present appeal is brought. Section 91(24) of the British North America Act, 1867 confersexclusive authority on the Parliament of Canada to legislate in re- lation to "Indians and Lands reserved for the Indians". Pursuantto this paragraph Parliament has enacted the Indian Act , R.S.C.1970, c. I-6. Section 60(1) of the Act provides that the Governor inCouncil may, at the request of a band, grant to the band the rightto exercise such control and management over land in the reserveoccupied by that band as the Governor in Council considers desira- ble. It is common ground that there has been no exercise of thispower. It is also common ground that there has been no exercise ofthe power of the Governor in Council to make regulations under s.73(1) applicable to the lands in question. Section 88 of the Indian Act reads as follows: 88. Subject to the terms of any treaty and any other Act of the Parliamentof Canada, all laws of general application from time to time in force in anyprovince are applicable to and in respect of Indians in the province, except tothe extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act or any order, rule, reg- ulation or by-law made thereunder, and except to the extent that such lawsmake provision for any matter for which provision is made by or under thisAct. It is agreed that this section has no application to the present dis- pute as neither the appellant nor the respondent is an Indian andalso it does not apply to Indian lands. Counsel for the appellant concedes that the Landlord and Ten- ant Act is valid legislation within the competence of the Legisla- ture of British Columbia. He also concedes that it is an Act of gen- eral application. The sole question in this appeal is whether or nots. 27 of that Act applies to the tenancy in question. We were in- vited by counsel for the appellant to rule on the application of allsections of the Landlord and Tenant Act to lands forming part ofan Indian reserve. This I decline to do. It is the practice of thisCourt to deal only with the specific dispute that is before it. In my view, the result of this appeal is determined by the major- ity decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Cardinal v. A.-G.Alta. (1973), 40 D.L.R. (3d) 553, 13 C.C.C. (2d) 1, [1974] 2 S.C.R. 695,and particularly at p. 560 D.L.R., p. 703 S.C.R., where Mr. JusticeMartland, speaking for the majority of the Court, said: 286 RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. (620) In my opinion, the test as to the application of provincial legislation within areserve is the same as with respect to its application within the Province andthat is that it must be within the authority of s. 92 and must not be in relationto a subject-matter assigned exclusively to the Canadian Parliament under s.91. Two of those subjects are Indians and Indian reserves, but if provincial leg- islation within the limits of s. 92 is not construed as being legislation in relationto those classes of subjects (or any other subject under s. 91) it is applicableanywhere in the Province, including Indian reserves, even though Indians orIndian reserves might be affected by it. My point is that s. 91(24) enumeratesclasses of subjects over which the federal Parliament has the exclusive powerto legislate, but it does not purport to define areas within a Province withinwhich the power of a Province to enact legislation, otherwise within its pow- ers, is to be excluded. Here, the Landlord and Tenant Act is within the authority of s.92. It is not in relation to a subject-matter assigned exclusively tothe Canadian Parliament under s. 91. This case is stronger on its facts than was the Cardinal case.There the Court held that if the legislation passed the above-men- tioned test it would be applicable everywhere in the Province, in- cluding Indian reserves, even though Indians or Indian reservesmight be affected by it. In the present case, the dispute is betweennon-Indians; further, an increase in rent does not affect Indianlands or the use of Indian lands. It follows that the rentalsman hasjurisdiction under s. 27 of the Landlord and Tenant Act to dealwith the dispute. Counsel for the appellant relied on the decision of this Court in Corp. of Surrey et al. v. Peace Arch Enterprises Ltd. et al. (1970),74W.W.R. 380, where it was held that developers holding a lease oflands forming part of an Indian reserve were not subject to munic- ipal zoning by-laws or to regulations made under the provincial Health Act , R.S.B.C. 1960, c. 170. In that case, however, the Courtheld that both zoning and health regulations were directed to theuse of that land. At p. 383, Maclean, J.A., speaking for the Court,said: It follows, I think, that if these lands are "lands reserved for the Indians"within the meaning of that expression as found in sec. 91(24) of the B.N.A.Act, 1867 , that provincial or municipal legislation purporting to regulate theuse of these "lands reserved for the Indians" is an unwarranted invasion of thelegislative jurisdiction of Parliament to legislate with respect to"lands reserved for the Indians". In Cardinal v. A.-G. Alta., supra , the Supreme Court of Canadainterpreted this decision as meaning that the provincial legislationin question related to the use of Indian lands and was therefore notapplicable to them. See the remarks of Martland, J., at pp. 560-1D.L.R., pp. 704-5 S.C.R.: In District of Surrey v. Peace Arch Enterprises Ltd. (1970), 74 W.W.R. 380,the situation was different. It involved lands in an Indian reserve which hadbeen "surrendered" in trust to the federal Crown for the purpose of leasing.The issue was as to whether the lands were subject, in their use by the lessees, (621) RE PARK MOBILE HOME SALES LTD. 287 who were non-Indians, to certain municipal by-laws and to Regulations underthe provincial Health Act . The Court found that the lands in question were still"lands reserved for the Indians" and, that being so, only the federal Parlia- ment could legislate as to the use to which they might be put. The Morley case[ R. v. Morley (1931), [1932] 4 D.L.R. 483, 58 C.C.C. 166, [1932] 2 W.W.R. 193] isnot mentioned in the judgment and I presume that this was so because thecases were not considered as parallel. Once it was determined that the lands re- mained lands reserved for the Indians, provincial legislation relating to theiruse was not applicable. The game law considered in the Morley case governedthe conduct of persons hunting game in British Columbia and was held to ap- ply in all parts of the Province. The Surrey case is thus distinguishable from that now before us.In the present case the section in question is not legislation in rela- tion to Indian land or the use of Indian land. A number of cases dealing with paramountcy and occupied fieldwere referred to by counsel, but that question does not arise be- cause the field has not been occupied by federal legislation. Accordingly, I would dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed.